Wednesday March 19,
2003
Tony Blair need not go into exile just yet. Last night his government
won formal
backing for war with Iraq when parliament voted 2-1 in
favour. This was despite the biggest ever revolt by MPs.
Among the ruling Labour party, 139 members rebelled, and 16
Conservatives, 53
Liberal Democrats and 11 others joined them. But because of Mr Blair's
massive
built-in majority, it was still well short of the total that might have
forced
regime change in Britain.
In other developments
overnight, the Turkish
government said it will try again to get permission from parliament for
US
warplanes to fly over its territory, and the White House suddenly
changed the
terms of its ultimatum to Saddam Hussein.
The Iraqi leader had
earlier been given 48 hours
to avert war by fleeing Iraq along with his two appalling sons, but
last night
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said US forces would invade "no
matter
what". The excuse, apparently, is that they need to hunt for weapons of
mass destruction.
The official UN
weapons inspectors, meanwhile,
have all been evacuated from Iraq - several of them complaining about
the
curtailment of their work and the aspersions that have been cast on
their
professional abilities. What chance they'll sue President Bush for
constructive
dismissal?
Colin Powell claimed
last night that 45 countries
have now joined the "coalition of the willing" against Iraq. They
include such key players as Afghanistan, Latvia, Lithuania, Nicaragua
and
Uzbekistan, but 15 of them have asked not to be named until they see
which way
the war is going.
In some cases,
calling these countries supporters
of the war would be extremely generous with the truth - a bit like
describing
concrete posts that hold up a football stadium as "supporters" of
Manchester United. Spain, whose smiling little prime minister managed
to get his
photo taken next to George Bush and Mr Blair at the weekend, has
confirmed that
it won't actually be sending any troops.
Talking of support,
an opinion poll this morning
by the Washington-based Pew Research Center finds rapidly declining
enthusiasm
for the United States in Europe. In Italy, only 34% view the US
favourably,
compared with 70% in 2002. The current figure for Britain is 48%, Spain
14%,
France 31% and Germany 25%.
The Iraqi parliament
is meeting this morning,
probably for the last time under its present management. Don't expect
any
surprises there - members do exactly what they're told, unlike MPs in
Britain.
It's just an exercise in spreading responsibility for Iraq's fate
beyond Saddam
and his immediate circle. The session began with the parliamentary
speaker
urging Iraqis to rally behind their leader.
At 1500 GMT foreign
ministers will get together
at the UN Security Council where the chief weapons inspector, Hans
Blix, is due
to give a report spelling out what Iraq should do to prove that it has
disarmed.
This is now totally irrelevant but France, Germany and Russia may seize
the
opportunity to denounce, once again, the coming invasion.
The American
ultimatum to Iraq expires tonight at
0115 GMT (0415 in Baghdad), and war could come any time after that.
President
Bush might wait another day or two until Turkey sorts its position out
or
weather conditions are favourable, but it's probably still worth tuning
in to
CNN or al-Jazeera tonight in case he does launch the most expensive
(and lethal)
fireworks display the world has ever seen.
An Iraqi
correspondent in Baghdad says everyone
there is trying to buy earplugs, so as not to lose too much sleep, but
the shops
have run out. If anyone has ideas for DIY earplugs, let us know and
we'll pass
the message on.
Weather in Baghdad
tonight: passing clouds, wind
west-south-west at 11 mph, humidity 45%, visibility 17 miles. Minimum
temperature 57 F (14 C), which the Lycos forecast describes as
"refreshingly cool".
Thursday
March 20, 2003
It's begun. Well, sort of ... but more with a whimper than a bang. Last
night's
deadline for Saddam Hussein to flee Iraq came and went, and at first
nothing
happened. For almost two hours, CNN's cameras - fixed on the roof of
the
information ministry in Baghdad - showed undramatic scenes of traffic
lights
changing in the street below and occasional vehicles passing.
Shortly before 0300
GMT, there were flashes in
the distance, accompanied by anti-aircraft fire from the Iraqis -
though
correspondents on the ground heard no planes. There was also a brief
flurry of
excitement when someone claimed the Americans had taken over the main
Iraqi
radio station but others who tuned in to listen found everything normal.
It turned out that
President George Bush had not
really meant to start the war last night but changed his mind when a
"target of opportunity" turned up. It appears that US military
intelligence thought they knew where Saddam Hussein was, along with
other
members of his regime, and proposed a "decapitation strike". If
successful, this would have brought the war to a halt even before it
had
properly got under way.
The assassination
plan was presented to Mr Bush
at a four-hour meeting which ended at 0020 GMT - just in time for the
president
to have what the White House described as a "relaxing dinner" with his
wife. On the way to dinner, Mr Bush told his
speechwriter to get busy.
At 0315 GMT he
appeared on television to announce
that "coalition" forces were in the early stages of military
operations against selective targets. Every effort would be made, he
said, to
show respect for Iraqi citizens, for the country's "great
civilisation" and its religious faiths.
But there would be no
half-measures, he warned.
"We will accept no outcome but victory."
With these words,
according to CNN, Mr Bush went
straight to bed.
CNN also promised a
live statement from Tony
Blair at 0330 GMT, but if the British prime minister did wake up to
echo his
master's voice, CNN didn't bother to show it.
Details of last
night's "decapitation
strike" are still sketchy, but it seems they targeted two sites on the
southern outskirts of Baghdad. More than 40 satellite-guided cruise
missiles
were reportedly used, mainly launched from ships and submarines. A
number of
F-117 stealth fighter-bombers also took part.
The Pentagon later
released video clips, filmed
in the dark, showing flashes and puffs of smoke as cruise missiles
blasted off
from a warship. These historic pictures, a CNN reporter enthused, had
been
transmitted back to Washington by the technological miracle of email.
According to the
Iraqi authorities, 10 people
died in the attack last night - though Saddam Hussein was apparently
not among
them.
One of the CNN's
armchair generals pointed out
that decapitation strikes rarely succeed. But he added that it would
still be
"very disconcerting" for Saddam, who would now be wondering if someone
inside the regime was giving the US information as to his whereabouts.
That, of course,
depends on what the missiles
actually hit. If US intelligence about the target of opportunity was as
inaccurate as it appears, Saddam is probably feeling rather relieved.
Some experts see last
night's assassination
attempt as part of a calculated psychological war, which includes the
rumours
circulated yesterday that Tariq Aziz, Iraq's deputy prime minister, had
either
defected or been killed.
Such things are
liable to damage the regime's
morale if people start to believe them, and yesterday Mr Aziz was
forced to call
a hasty press conference in order to prove he was still alive.
Today, Iraq responded
to the "decapitation
strike" with a radio message from Saddam's son, Udai, followed by the
information minister who told listeners "victory is certain, certain,
certain", and finally a TV appearance by Saddam Hussein (or at least
someone looking very much like him). He seemed to have acquired a new
pair of
spectacles for the occasion, with impressively thick black rims.
Latest word from the
US is that the main
"shock and awe" attack on Baghdad is still some hours away - probably
after nightfall this evening.
President Bush's
diary for the next 24 hours is
clear of official engagements, except for another dinner - not with his
wife
this time, but with the president of Cameroon.
Weather in Baghdad
today: mild, with more sun
than clouds. Tonight: broken clouds, cool.
Friday
March 21, 2003
After an initial diversion to take pot-shots at Saddam Hussein
yesterday, the
war is now well under way, but mercifully without the "shock and awe"
tactics that had been predicted for the opening phase.
Military chiefs have
not entirely abandoned the
idea of a massive bombing campaign but are waiting to see if Iraqi
forces can be
persuaded to give up the fight without it.
If "shock and awe"
can be avoided there
will be less risk of heavy civilian casualties and less damage to be
repaired
afterwards. So far, there has been little resistance from the Iraqi
army, which
is heavily outgunned by western technology - though the threat to
invading
forces could become more serious as they approach Baghdad.
Iraq has fired a
number of missiles at Kuwait and
there is argument as to whether any of them were Scuds. If they were,
it would
be proof that Saddam has been lying about his weaponry.
An unspecified number
of oil fires have been
detected by satellites, suggesting that Saddam may be resorting to
scorched-earth tactics, as he did towards the end of the 1991 war in
Kuwait. If
carried out on a large scale, this would not only slow progress of the
invasion
but delay Iraq's postwar recovery as well as causing long-term
environmental
damage.
Yesterday, American
and British forces advanced
into southern Iraq, with British marines launching an assault on the
strategically important Faw peninsula. The port of Umm Qasr, just
across the
border from Kuwait, was also captured.
This morning, there
are reports of US tanks
moving rapidly through the desert towards Baghdad, meeting little
resistance
along the way. Whether they are heading immediately to Baghdad is
unclear - it
could be partly a psychological move to frighten the Iraqi leadership.
The war also brought
its first western casualties
yesterday when a helicopter crashed in Kuwait, killing 12 British
soldiers and
four American crew. There is no suggestion that the aircraft was shot
down.
Baghdad came under
renewed attack last night from
some 60 cruise missiles aimed at government and military targets. One
of the
buildings hit was the planning ministry. Explosions were also heard in
Basra in
southern Iraq and Mosul in the north.
Today, apart from the
fast-moving developments in
the south, attention is also likely to focus on the north, where the
picture is
still far from clear. The US is anxious to secure this area early
because of the
possibility of independent action by Kurdish forces, or even by Turkey.
Outside Iraq,
opposition to the war continues
strongly. Britain and France clashed again last night at a European
summit in
Brussels. One of the arguments - which is likely to grow louder in the
coming
weeks - is about who should pay for rebuilding Iraq after the war.
France has
already suggested that those who cause the damage should foot the bill.
On the streets, there
have also been worldwide
protests, with hundreds arrested in the United States. In Britain. Even
schoolchildren have been skipping classes to attend demonstrations -
some of
them organised via text messages. Riot police were out in force in
Cairo
yesterday, lashing out with batons at protesters who directed their
anger at
President Hosni Mubarak as well as the United States.
As today is the first
Friday since the outbreak
of war - a Muslim holiday - further protests can be expected in the
Middle East
after midday prayers.
Anger may be further
inflamed by Israel's
announcement that the US has offered $10bn (£6.4bn) to support
its
crisis-ridden economy. Although the US has not confirmed the offer,
this is
liable to be viewed in the region as further evidence of American
double
standards.
Monday
March 24, 2003
It is day five, and suddenly the clinical, precision war talked about
by General
Tommy Franks at the Centcom press conference on Saturday is looking
very messy.
Five US soldiers from
a maintenance unit,
including a woman, were paraded on Iraqi television yesterday
afternoon, looking
battered and confused. They had been taken prisoner after their vehicle
lost its
way in Suq al-Shuyukh, near Nassiriya.
The Arab satellite
channel, al-Jazeera, also
showed pictures of the corpses of several US soldiers who were killed
in the
same area.
Terry Lloyd, a
reporter with the British
television news channel ITN, was confirmed dead yesterday. Two of his
colleagues
are still missing in the Basra area.
Evidence of civilian
casualties on the Iraqi side
emerged over the weekend, when al-Jazeera broadcast horrific pictures
from both
Basra, in the south, and the area in which the Ansar al-Islam group was
bombed,
in the north. One showed a child's head split open.
Although some of the
invasion forces have sped on
towards Baghdad, others have been left behind to mop up local
resistance, a job
which is proving a lot more difficult than reports had at first
suggested.
Umm Qasr, the port
town just across the border
from Kuwait, has been reported as having been "secured" several times,
but it is still not certain whether the invasion forces have total
control
there.
The Iraqi
vice-president, Taha Yassin Ramadan,
yesterday gave an upbeat press conference, claiming that "operations
are
going on in an excellent and comfortable manner for Iraq".
He continued
ominously: "They say that they
are heading towards Baghdad, and that they covered more than 160 or
180km
towards Baghdad.
"I would like to tell
them that, in the
course that they are following, let them continue up to 300km and let
them
mobilise all the tanks and marines they have, and we will not clash
with them
soon. We will give them enough time.
"However, in any
contact with any Iraqi
village or city, they [the invasion forces] will find what they are now
witnessing in Umm Qasr and Suq al-Shuyukh."
This morning, two
British soldiers were reported
missing after their vehicle came under fire in southern Iraq. The
defence
ministry in London gave no further details.
Over the weekend, a
British Tornado warplane
returning from a mission in Iraq was mistaken for an incoming missile,
and was
shot down by Patriot rockets in Kuwait. The crew of two died.
In a bizarre incident
on Saturday, one US soldier
died and 15 more were injured when one of their colleagues threw
grenades into
tents at a camp in Kuwait.
This was at first
reported as a terrorist attack,
but it seems more reminiscent of the "fragging" phenomenon witnessed
during the Vietnam war, when disaffected soldiers attacked their
officers with
fragmentation grenades on several occasions.
So far, most of the
confirmed deaths among the
invasion forces have not come as a result of combat with Iraqis.
Fourteen
British and six US personnel have died in accidents, two Britons have
been
killed by friendly fire, and one American died in the grenade incident.
A crisis is also
brewing on the northern border,
where Turkish forces appear to have defied the US by entering the
Kurdish area
of Iraq. Adopting the same line of argument used by the US to justify
its own
invasion, Turkey says that it is merely taking "pre-emptive action".
An exclusive report
in the Jerusalem Post this
morning says that US forces are investigating a large factory in
southern Iraq
that could be connected with chemical weapons. If this turns out to be
true, it
would provide a huge boost to those who favoured military action rather
than
continued weapons inspections.
As yet, however,
there is no confirmation, but
more details may emerge during the course of the day.
Meanwhile, in a
televised address to the country,
the Iraqi president, Saddam Hussein, promised triumph over the
coalition forces.
He hailed Iraqi resistance and said: "Be patient, victory is coming."
Tuesday
March 25, 2003
The only good news today is that the invasion forces are now within 50
miles or
so of Baghdad - though a look back through the old newspapers shows
that similar
claims have been made for several days. The difference now, perhaps, is
that
there are far more American and British troops near the Iraqi capital
than
before.
In preparation for an
assault on Baghdad,
invasion forces have begun an intensive bombardment of Iraqi Republican
Guard
bunkers 30 miles outside the city. This, in the view of many, marks a
crucial
point in the war.
The advance on
Baghdad is seen as good news by
the prime minister, Tony Blair, who yesterday promised "certain
victory".
"The vital goal is to
reach Baghdad as
swiftly as possible, thus bringing the end of the regime closer," he
said.
But Saddam Hussein,
who gave a televised speech
yesterday, also saw the US-British advance as good news because it
draws the
invaders more deeply into his trap.
Despite the Iraqi
leader's broadcast, some
western spokesmen persisted with the idea that Saddam is dead and
hinted that
his speech might have been recorded in advance. If so, the late Saddam
Hussein
had remarkable clairvoyant powers because he mentioned numerous current
events.
Meanwhile, serious
trouble continues in Basra,
Nassiriya and other parts of southern Iraq, though this morning the BBC
reported
that "substantial numbers" of US forces are at last passing through
Nassiriya.
Even in Umm Qasr,
just over the border from
Kuwait, resistance continues. Last Saturday, 30 Iraqi fighters were
said to be
holding out there; today they are said to number "only" 100.
Overnight, the
British military announced that a
soldier from the 1st Battalion of the Black Watch had been killed in
action near
al-Zubayr in southern Iraq. A sandstorm was also hampering US troops
advancing
on Baghdad.
In other
developments, President Bush is expected
to ask Congress today for $75bn (£48bn) towards the cost of the
war.
An opinion poll in
Britain shows a sudden surge
in the number of people who approve of military action to remove Saddam
Hussein.
There are now 54% in favour - a 16-point increase over seven days.
Those against
have dropped from 38% to 30%.
Today's big scare
story comes from American TV
networks which claim, citing intelligence sources, that Iraqi troops
could be
authorised to use chemical weapons if other means of defending the city
fail.
Yesterday's scare, an
exclusive story in the
Jerusalem Post - where Pentagon arch-hawk Richard Perle is a board
member - told
of the discovery of a suspected chemical weapons factory in southern
Iraq. There
is still no confirmation of the factory's purpose, and some experts
have cast
serious doubt on it.
With less than a week
gone, predictions of a
quick and clinical victory are looking less credible than they did in
the first
couple of days. Wars are rarely that easy, and it is difficult to know
what the
real (but private) expectations of General Franks and the other
commanders were.
But they do seem to
have been surprised by the
levels of resistance in the south, where Saddam's cousin, "Chemical
Ali", is in charge.
There is also
disappointment that the Shia
population of the south have not risen up against the Ba'athist regime.
A Shia
opposition official, interviewed on the radio last night, explained
this very
simply.
In 1991, he said, the
Americans encouraged them
to rebel against Saddam, but were then betrayed by the US. They are not
going to
be fooled a second time and will therefore keep their heads down until
they are
sure who is winning.
More generally,
though there is ample evidence of
popular hatred for Saddam and his regime, there are few signs of
enthusiasm for
the American and British invaders either. The following quote, sent in
by a
reader, may be relevant: "Our armies do not come into your cities and
lands
as conquerors or enemies, but as liberators. Your wealth has been
stripped of
you by unjust men ... The people of Baghdad shall flourish under
institutions
which are in consonance with their sacred laws."
The words were
uttered by General F S Maude,
commander of British forces in Iraq ... and the year was 1917.
Wednesday March 26, 2003
After a series of setbacks, and with the advance on Baghdad delayed by
sandstorms, the invasion forces were badly in need of some positive
developments
yesterday.
The first success of
the day - which came just at
the right moment for prime-time television news in the UK - was a claim
by the
British military that a "popular uprising" against Saddam Hussein's
regime had broken out in Basra.
British forces then
weighed in with artillery
support for the rebelling Shia population and a 2,000-lb bomb was
dropped on the
Ba'ath party headquarters, according to reports. The British deputy
commander,
Major-General Peter Wall, hailed the uprising as "just the sort of
encouraging indication we have been looking for".
At present, very
little news is coming out of
Basra from independent sources, so it is difficult to be sure what is
really
happening. Some British versions have been much more cautious,
describing the
uprising as "nascent", while al-Jazeera's reporter inside the city
said there was no sign of any uprising at all.
Until now, Shia
organisations in southern Iraq
have been very wary of getting involved in the war. In 1991, the US
encouraged
them to rebel but then abandoned them to their fate at the hands of
Saddam's
merciless men.
The US 7th Cavalry
also claimed success yesterday
in a battle against Iraqi foot-soldiers near Najaf, 100 miles south of
Baghdad.
News of this no-contest victory, in which two American tanks and an
armoured
troop carrier were damaged, came just at the right moment for
prime-time TV in
the United States. Between 150 and 500 Iraqis are believed to have died.
Two British soldiers
were killed and two more
critically injured when one Challenger tank opened fire on another in a
"misdirected attack" on Monday, it was announced yesterday. It is the
second time during this war that "friendly fire" has claimed British
lives, and an investigation is under way.
Overnight, bombing
continued in Baghdad,
apparently aimed at Iraqi state television. Broadcasts were interrupted
briefly
but resumed with a weaker signal - presumably from a back-up
transmitter.
In Nassiriya
yesterday, US officers said they had
found 3,000 chemical protection suits and large quantities of nerve gas
antidote
at a hospital which had been used as a base by Iraqi soldiers fighting
the
invasion. This is being interpreted as evidence that Iraq may be
prepared to use
chemical weapons.
However, the
"antidote" - atropine -
also has routine medical uses for treating heart patients and some
respiratory
conditions.
President George Bush
formally asked Congress
yesterday for almost $75bn (£48bn) to fund the war. He had
delayed making the
request until the invasion got under way, for fear of objections.
But far from balking
at the cost, some
congressmen seemed eager to provide more than he asked for. The figures
suggest
the US has budgeted for a war that will last one month.
The United Nations,
meanwhile, announced that it
will appeal for $1bn to save Iraq from a humanitarian disaster. Sixty
per cent
of Iraqis depend entirely on the UN's food rations and, according to
the World
Food Programme, only five weeks' supplies are left.
A subsidiary of
Halliburton, vice-president Dick
Cheney's old company, has been awarded a contract by the US army to put
out
fires and repair damaged infrastructure in the Iraqi oil industry. The
value of
the deal has not been officially disclosed, but is said to be in the
region of
$1bn.
Mr Cheney was chief
executive of Halliburton
until 2000 but gave up his stake in the company on becoming US
vice-president.
He reportedly still gets about $1m a year "compensation" from the
company.
The British prime
minister, Tony Blair, is due to
meet President Bush in the US today. Apart from reviewing progress of
the war,
the two leaders are expected to discuss ways of patching up relations
between
the US and Europe once the war is over.
The UN security
council has also scheduled an
emergency meeting which is due to begin later today, possibly
continuing until
tomorrow. This is in response to calls from Arab and non-aligned
countries for
an end to the war and the withdrawal of US-led troops. It is unclear
whether
there will be any attempt to table a resolution to this effect - though
such a
move would almost certainly be vetoed by the US and Britain.
Thursday
March 27, 2003
More than 1,000 members of the US 173rd Airborne Brigade landed in
Kurdish-held
northern Iraq overnight, with the aim of securing an airfield that can
be used
by cargo planes to land tanks and other equipment - thus opening up a
northern
front in the war.
The US military had
originally hoped to send
troops in over land, but failed to reach an agreement with Turkey, and
so has
resorted to air drops as a fall-back plan.
Activity on the
northern front may divert some
attention from southern Iraq, where the invasion forces are making slow
headway.
There are murmurings from some military experts that more troops are
needed -
which is just what the politicians don't want to hear.
At least 14 Iraqis
were killed yesterday and
dozens injured in a crowded marketplace in the Shaab district of
northern
Baghdad - apparently the result of American bombing.
The US military has
so far given four different
explanations: that one of its precision missiles might have gone
astray; that
the attack was aimed at Iraqi anti-aircraft missiles "positioned less
than
300ft from homes"; that an Iraqi anti-aircraft missile hit the market;
that
an accurately-aimed US missile was deflected by Iraqi ground fire.
The gruesome scenes
in the marketplace figured
prominently in al-Jazeera's war coverage throughout the day, though the
Iraqi
deaths only made the third item in CNN's early morning news and largely
vanished
from American television after that.
The confused
explanations given by the US
military also raise questions about the competence of their information
machine.
As a source of information it's rapidly proving untrustworthy and as a
source of
propaganda it's equally ineffective.
Centcom's
increasingly fraught press briefings in
Qatar seem designed to provide junk news for the pliant American media
while
reporters from the rest of the world demand real answers to real
questions.
The mystery over the
"popular uprising"
in Basra, announced by Britain on Tuesday, continues. British forces
say they
are getting a lot of information from inside the besieged city but
still cannot
give a coherent account of what is going on. One theory is that the
"uprising" is/was a quarrel between different Ba'athist elements.
About 120 Iraqi tanks
and armoured vehicles
reportedly left Basra last night, heading south-east towards the Faw
peninsula,
and came under attack from the invasion forces. It is unclear how many
have been
destroyed.
Another overnight
report, that a huge armoured
column of Republican Guards was heading south from Baghdad, has been
denied by
the US military.
Other developments:
- The US
is investigating reports that 37 Marines were injured by "friendly
fire" near Nasiriya.
- British
officials say that two dead soldiers, whose bodies were shown on
al-Jazeera
television yesterday, are "probably" two Britons who went missing near
al-Zubayr on Sunday.
- The
first British ship bringing humanitarian aid (200 tonnes of food, water
and
blankets) to Iraq has been unable to dock at Umm Qasr because of mines.
It is
expected to be delayed for 24 hours.
- An
opinion poll by the Pew Research Centre says the number of Americans
who believe
the war is going well has fallen from 71% to 38% between last Friday
and Monday.
- The US
Fourth Infantry Division, originally destined for the northern front
via Turkey,
will shortly begin deploying to Kuwait, though it will not be ready to
fight for
another two to three weeks - a sign, perhaps, that the war will not be
over
quickly.
George
Bush and Tony Blair are meeting in Camp David today. An
article in the Washington Post this morning pays glowing tribute to Mr
Blair:
"His stature is high, his agenda ambitious, his optimism seemingly
boundless ... He even looks more robust - the wan, haunted demeanour of
recent
weeks as he fought off the flu and widespread popular opposition in
Britain to
war has been replaced with rosier cheeks and his old cherubic grin."
Less
reverentially, the visit gave rise to ribald jokes on a British TV show
last
night about the nature of the two men's "special relationship".
Friday
March 28, 2003
Amid admissions that Iraq has surprised the invasion forces with the
strength of
its resistance, and official predictions that the conflict will last
longer than
originally expected, there is news from Washington that Richard Perle,
chief
architect of the war, has resigned as chairman of the Pentagon's
influential
Defence Policy Board.
Mr Perle says he
resigned to stop allegations
about his business interests becoming a distraction from the "urgent
challenge" of invading Iraq, but he apparently intends to stay on in a
more
minor role.
In 1996 Mr Perle,
nicknamed the Prince of
Darkness, was the main author of a report entitled "Clean Break" whose
contents were revealed by the Guardian last September (Playing
skittles with Saddam, September 3 2002). This set out a plan to
protect
Israel's strategic interests by reshaping the Middle East, starting
with regime
change in Iraq.
Last week, the
Guardian disclosed Mr Perle's
links to an intelligence-related computer firm that stands to profit
from war
with Iraq (Pentagon
hawk linked to UK intelligence company, March 21 2003). Mr Perle
has denied
separate allegations published earlier this month in the New Yorker,
and
threatened to sue the magazine in Britain, where libel cases are much
harder to
defend than in the US.
According to a report
to be published today by
the US watchdog Center for Public Integrity, at least 10 out of 30
members of
the Pentagon committee are executives or lobbyists with companies that
have tens
of billions of dollars' worth of contracts with the US defence
department and
other government agencies.
Britain's chief
military officer in the Gulf, Air
Marshal Brian Burridge, yesterday attacked American moves to hand over
the
running of Iraq's largest port to a company which has a history of bad
industrial relations and has faced accusations of union-busting.
The firm, Stevedoring
Services of American, has
been awarded a £3m contract to manage Umm Qasr by the Bush
administration.
Britain argues that the port should be run by Iraqis once it has been
made
secure.
Another contract in
Umm Qasr - for construction
work - has gone to a subsidiary of Halliburton, Vice-President Dick
Cheney's old
firm.
Meanwhile, the
arrival of the first ship carrying
humanitarian aid to Umm Qasr has again been delayed because of the
continuing
risk from mines.
George Bush and Tony
Blair ended their summit at
Camp David yesterday with a joint press conference where they vowed to
fight
"for as long as it takes" to remove Saddam Hussein from power. But
with growing perceptions in the Middle East that the invasion is aimed
at
conquering Iraq rather than liberating it, there is also a growing
possibility
that the removal of Saddam will not mark the end of the war.
From Camp David, Mr
Blair went on to New York for
talks with the UN secretary-general, Kofi Annan. Discussions centred on
plans
for a new security council resolution to restart the oil-for-food
programme on
which 60% of Iraqis depend for their survival.
The bombing of
Baghdad continued overnight and a
BBC correspondent in the city said the explosions heard were among the
most
violent since the start of the war. Targets included an Iraqi
communications
centre which was hit by two 4,700-lb "bunker-busting" bombs, according
to US officials.
Following the
parachute landing by about 1,000
troops to secure an airfield in northern Iraq on Wednesday, US cargo
planes have
begun delivering military supplies there, along with 200 more troops.
One of the main
difficulties facing the invasion
forces almost everywhere in Iraq is distinguishing soldiers from
civilians - and
the Baghdad regime is clearly putting civilians at risk by deliberately
confusing the picture.
A "pooled" (and
apparently censored)
report by a Reuters correspondent this morning describes an attack by
US marines
on a bus near Nassirya in which 20 Iraqis were killed. The dead were
wearing
some civilian clothing and were said to be carrying papers that
identified them
as members of the Republican Guard - though the report says that only
two guns
were found on the bus.
British and American
rules of engagement normally
require clear evidence that targets are armed and hostile before troops
can open
fire. But because of the Iraqi use of non-uniformed fighters, troops
are finding
themselves in the invidious position of having to make split-second
judgments.
This bodes ill for
any future attempt to capture
Baghdad. The Iraqi defence minister, Sultan Hashem Ahmed, was quoted
yesterday
as saying the capital "cannot be taken as long as the citizens in it
are
still alive".
Saturday March 29, 2003
Iraq suffered another civilian tragedy and the invasion forces suffered
another
public relations disaster when an explosion in a crowded market area of
Baghdad
killed more than 50 people yesterday.
It was the second
incident of its kind within two
days. A similar blast killed 14 people in a marketplace on Wednesday.
In the midst of an
almost round-the-clock blitz
on the city, there were strong suspicions that this was another
mis-aimed strike
by an American missile.
Following Wednesday's
explosion, US officials
gave a range of conflicting explanations - including the suggestion
that it was
caused by an Iraqi anti-aircraft missile falling back to earth - but
last night
the Pentagon made no immediate comment on the latest incident.
Whatever the actual
cause, the damage to the US
in terms of public opinion has already been done and will not be easily
undone.
TV stations - particularly the Arab satellite channels - showed
pictures of the
victims throughout the day, reinforcing the impression that the US is a
greater
immediate threat than Saddam Hussein.
In a move that
threatens to widen the conflict,
US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld yesterday issued a warning to two
of Iraq's
neighbours, Syria and Iran.
He claimed that
"military supplies" had
been crossing the border from Syria into Iraq - though the only item he
specifically mentioned was night-vision goggles.
Mr Rumsfeld took care
not to blame the Syrian
government directly for the alleged trafficking but said the government
would be
held accountable for it.
He also complained
about "activity"
inside Iraq by the Iranian-based Badr Corps and said the Iranian
government
would be held responsible for that.
The American
neo-conservatives regard war with
Iraq as the first stage of their wider plan to reshape Israel's
"strategic
environment" by toppling various regimes in the Middle East.
During a visit to
Israel last month, John Bolton,
US undersecretary of state for arms control, discussed with prime
minister Ariel
Sharon which countries to "deal with" after Iraq. Syria and Iran
emerged as the favourites.
Early this morning a
missile caused damage in
Souq Sharq, a shopping and leisure area on the seafront in Kuwait City.
The
missile is thought to have landed nearby in the sea.
Although damage was
light and no serious
casualties were reported, this appears to be the first time since the
war began
that an Iraqi missile - believed to be a Chinese-made Silkworm - has
got through
the protective cordon of Patriot batteries into the Kuwaiti capital.
One theory is that
the missile was fired from the
Faw peninsula in southern Iraq and skimmed low over the sea to evade
Kuwait's
radar system.
Also this morning,
there is a report by Reuters -
attributed to unnamed US officers - that an "operational pause" in the
war lasting several days is being planned to allow for re-grouping and
re-supply
of the American forces around Baghdad. So far, US military officials
have
refused to comment on the report.
Meanwhile, British
military officials say they
have no evidence to back up claims that four or five British soldiers
were
kidnapped in Basra overnight.
Sunday March 30, 2003
Four American soldiers died yesterday near Najaf in the first suicide
bombing of
the war.
At a press conference
afterwards, Iraq's
vice-president, Taha Yassin Ramadan, named the bomber as Ali Jaafar
al-Nuamani,
a non-commissioned officer in the Iraqi army - and indicated that
suicide
bombings will now become "routine military policy".
He also repeated the
threat to carry out attacks
in the US and Britain: "We will use any means ... and we will follow
the
enemy into its land," the vice-president said.
In an article in the
Sunday Mirror this morning,
Britain's former foreign secretary, Robin Cook, denounces the invasion
as
"bloody and unnecessary", and calls for British troops to be brought
home because of the risk of stoking up a "long-term legacy of hatred"
for the west throughout the Arab and Muslim world.
Mr Cook, who earlier
resigned from the government
in protest, says President Bush and his defence secretary, Donald
Rumsfeld, seem
to have no idea what to do now that their hopes that Iraq would swiftly
capitulate have proved unfounded.
In the US, Mr
Rumsfeld is increasingly being
blamed for the military quagmire. The latest issue of the New Yorker
magazine
accuses him of repeatedly rejecting advice from his advisers about the
number of
troops that would be needed.
He was so convinced
that the Iraqi regime would
fall apart that he insisted at least six times on sharply reducing the
number of
ground troops that the military planners wanted to send, the article
says.
It also reveals that
he overruled advice from the
war commander, General Tommy Franks, to delay the invasion until troops
who had
been denied access through Turkey could be brought in by another route.
Mr Rumsfeld, who on
Friday threatened to drag
Syria and Iran into the war, is due to give interviews for the Fox and
ABC
television channels later today.
The bodies of the
first British casualties
arrived back in Britain yesterday, in coffins draped with the union
flag.
According to the
latest figures from Reuters, 23
Britons and 36 Americans have been killed so far, with a further 15
Americans
missing. Most deaths have been the result of accidents or "friendly
fire".
Overnight, the US
said two more marines had been
killed in accidents. One drowned when his vehicle rolled into a canal
and the
other was hit by a vehicle during a firefight with Iraqi soldiers.
On the Iraqi side,
reliable casualty figures are
difficult to obtain. The official estimate is 589 killed and 4,582
injured, but
there are suspicions that many other deaths are not being disclosed by
the Iraqi
authorities because of the possible effect on morale.
Early this morning,
British forces said they had
captured five Iraqi officers and killed a colonel of the Republican
Guard in
village near Basra.
There are also
reports of numerous
"explosions" in Baghdad, Basra and Mosul. In southern Iraq, the US
says it has placed troops from US army's 82nd Airborne Division placed
near
Nassiriya to protect supply lines. Meanwhile, artillery fire has been
heard just
north of Umm Qasr, the Iraqi port that has frequently but wrongly been
declared
secure.
In the north, Iraqi
troops have been bombarding
areas near Chamchamal, which they earlier gave up to a Kurdish advance.
Kurdish
militias, in turn, say they have pushed about 16 miles into Iraqi
government
territory north of Kirkuk.
Citing military
strategists, the Observer reports
this morning that a full-scale assault on the Republican Guards could
begin
within three days and last for 10 days. That would be followed by a
battle for
Baghdad itself, lasting up to five weeks - taking the campaign into
mid-May.
The British
government yesterday repeated its
view that the war will end once Saddam Hussein is removed, but there
are growing
signs that this will only mark the end of the first phase. The next
stage -
making Iraq secure and establishing a stable government - is likely to
be longer
and more even more difficult.
"A prolonged stay of
US and British forces
may turn the country into a magnet for militants seeking a new jihad,"
according to a report by Associated Press, which says thousands of
Muslim
militants who say they are ready for martyrdom have flocked to Iraq
since the
war began.
It quotes a warning
by John Voll, an Islamic
affairs expert at Georgetown University in the United States: "If there
is
an American occupation, then Iraq will definitely move to the top of
the list of
jihad for the international network of Islamists."
Monday March 31, 2003
American leaders moved swiftly yesterday to prevent the opening up of
another
front in the war - this time between Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence
secretary,
and his military chiefs.
The fuss is over an
article published today in
the New
Yorker magazine, which blames Mr Rumsfeld for many of the problems
on the
battlefield.
It says that in the
planning stages of the war,
the defence secretary and his team of civilian advisers repeatedly
overruled the
military experts because they thought they knew better.
Both Mr Rumsfeld and
the war commander, General
Tommy Franks, have denied the allegations - though it's an open secret
that Mr
Rumsfeld's style of management has annoyed many in the Pentagon.
Meanwhile, a sign of
possible dissent in the
British ranks is a report this morning that three unnamed soldiers from
the 16
Air Assault Brigade have been sent home to face a court martial. They
are
understood to have complained about the way the war is being fought and
the
growing danger to civilians.
Following the first
suicide bombing of the war,
which killed four American soldiers on Saturday, Iraq has claimed for
have more
than 4,000 other volunteers ready to "martyr" themselves.
Although Saddam
Hussein's regime is largely
secular, religious militants throughout the region will probably make
strenuous
efforts over the coming months to "Islamise" the conflict - as
happened during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s.
The Palestinian
Islamic Jihad group yesterday
issued a statement announcing "the good news" that the first of its
suicide bombers had arrived in Baghdad. Because of the extremely tight
security
in Israel, American and British troops in Iraq are likely to become an
easier
and more attractive target for the foreseeable future.
Angered by the TV
images of civilian casualties
and the feeble efforts of their own governments to prevent the war,
Arabs from
various countries have been volunteering to fight in Iraq. Reports
mention 100
in Algeria and 50 in Egypt. In Lebanon, 20 volunteers are said to have
already
gone, while hundreds more have applied for Iraqi visas.
In northern Kuwait
yesterday, 15 US soldiers were
injured when a civilian charged at them in a pick-up truck just outside
their
base at Camp Udairi. The attacker, said to be an Egyptian migrant
worker, was
shot and critically injured.
Bombing in and around
Baghdad continued
relentlessly over the weekend - though the US says three-quarters of
the attacks
are aimed at weakening the Republican Guard, which has set up a
protective
cordon around the city. Early this morning the information ministry was
in
flames, having been targeted by Tomahawk cruise missiles to "reduce the
command and control capabilities" of the Iraqi government, according to
the
US.
One of the ministry's
main functions is to
supervise foreign journalists working in Iraq, and normally they are
required to
file reports from the ministry building so that their activities can be
monitored. Night-time scenes of Baghdad frequently shown by CNN came
from a
camera on the ministry's roof. Ahead of the attack, much of the media
activity
had been transferred to the Palestine Hotel.
Also this morning,
there are reports of
significant military activity around Nassiriya where, according to the
BBC,
5,000 additional US troops, including special forces, are being sent in
an
effort to defeat continuing Iraqi resistance.
A dawn raid on
Shatra, north of the Nassiriya,
reportedly targeted Saddam's cousin, "Chemical Ali", and other senior
Iraqi officials who are believed to be directing guerrilla attacks in
the area.
In Nassiriya itself,
the US says marines have
found large quantities of gas masks and anti-nerve gas chemicals in an
abandoned
Iraqi camp. It is reported this morning that American troops are
attempting to
communicate with Iraqis in the field via a hand-held electronic box
known as a
Phrasealator, which was first tried out in Afghanistan.
The user points to
one of 1,000 phrases on a menu
- such as "come out with your hands up" - and the box squawks out the
message in Pashtu, Dari, Urdu or, in this case, Arabic. Unfortunately,
there is
no way the Americans can understand what the Iraqis say in reply.
Tuesday April 1, 2003
The invasion forces suffered another self-inflicted disaster in the
battle for
hearts and minds yesterday when soldiers from the US 3rd infantry
division shot
dead Iraqi seven women and children.
The incident occurred
on Route 9, near Najaf,
when a car carrying 13 women and children approached a checkpoint.
A US military
spokesman says the soldiers
motioned the vehicle to stop but their signals were ignored. However,
according
to the Washington Post, Captain Ronny Johnson, who was in charge of the
checkpoint, blamed his own troops for ignoring orders to fire a warning
shot.
"You just fucking
killed a family because
you didn't fire a warning shot soon enough!", he reportedly yelled at
them.
In another checkpoint
incident this morning, US
forces say they killed an unarmed Iraqi driver outside Shatra.
Meanwhile it has
emerged - as a result of
detective work on the internet by a Guardian reader - that the
explosion in a
Baghdad market which killed more than 60 people last Friday was indeed
caused by
a cruise missile and not an Iraqi anti-aircraft rocket as the US has
suggested.
A metal fragment
found at the scene by British
journalist Robert Fisk carried various markings, including "MFR 96214
09". This, our reader pointed out in an email, is a manufacturer's
identification number known as a "cage code".
Cage codes can be
looked up on the internet (www.gidm.dlis.dla.mil),
and keying in the number 96214 traces the fragment back to a plant in
McKinney,
Texas, owned by the Raytheon Company.
Raytheon, whose
headquarters are in Lexington,
Massachusetts, aspires "to be the most admired defence and aerospace
systems supplier through world-class people and technology", according
to
its website (www.raytheon.com).
It makes a vast array of military equipment, including the AGM-129
cruise
missile which is launched from B-52 bombers.
On the political
front, two new quarrels have
broken out. One centres on an attempt by the US to set up its own
inspection
team to find the alleged Iraqi weapons that United Nations inspectors
did not
find. The US appears unaware that such a project will have little
credibility
internationally and has pressed ahead, offering jobs to some of the UN
inspectors.
The two chief UN
inspectors, Hans Blix and
Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Authority,
are
reportedly furious. Dr Baradei, in remarks quoted by the BBC, insisted
that the
IAEA is the sole body with legal authority to verify any nuclear
programmes in
Iraq.
The other row
concerns the new
Pentagon-controlled Iraqi government that the US is establishing in
Kuwait, with
23 ministries, each headed by an American and with four US-appointed
Iraqi
advisers.
Former US general Jay
Garner, who was placed in
overall charge of the "interim government", is annoyed by the efforts
of Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defence secretary, to impose several
controversial
Iraqis as advisers in the government.
They include Ahmed
Chalabi, head of the
opposition Iraqi National Congress, who will be offered an advisory
post in the
finance ministry. Mr Chalabi was previously convicted in his absence of
a
multi-million dollar banking fraud in Jordan, though he denies the
charges.
Mr Wolfowitz wants
posts in other ministries to
go to Mr Chalabi's nephew, Salem, and to three of his close associates,
Tamara
Daghestani, Goran Talebani and Aras Habib.
In an interview with
the BBC yesterday, the
British home secretary, David Blunkett, conceded that at present the
invasion
forces are "seen as villains", but he added:
"Once this is over
and there is a free Iraq,
with a democratic state ... the population as a whole will say that we
want a
free country, we want a state to live in where we can use our talents
to the
full."
The veteran American
war correspondent, Peter
Arnett, was sacked by NBC television yesterday for giving an interview
to an
Iraqi TV journalist in which he said the US had "misjudged the
determination of the Iraqi forces". He was immediately offered a new
job by
a British newspaper, the Daily Mirror, which opposes the war.
Another war-related
tragedy has occurred in
Israel, where two elderly sisters were found dead - apparently
suffocated - in a
room that they had made airtight against a possible Iraqi chemical
attack. Three
others died in similar circumstances a fortnight ago.
On the ground in
Iraq, battles continue in
various locations. US forces "testing" the southern defences of
Baghdad are reportedly fighting Republican Guards and other forces at
Hindiya,
some 50 miles from the capital.
Fighting has also
erupted along the Euphrates
river near ancient Babylon. US marines entered Shatra, 20 miles north
of
Nassiriya, after storming it with planes, tanks and helicopter
gunships, and
British Royal Marines clashed with Iraqi paramilitaries south of Basra.
Bombing of Baghdad
continued overnight. Targets
included the Iraqi national Olympic committee, which is run by Saddam
Hussein's
son, Uday.
At least one American
soldier has been reported
killed at Hindiya. A British soldier was also killed yesterday - the
26th since
the war began. The defence ministry said he died "in the course of his
duties" but gave no details.
.../next
|